Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter

Wed Sep 12 16:09:31 UTC 2007

> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 10:34:20 -0500
> From: "Church, Charles" <cchurc05 at harris.com>
> Sender: owner-nanog at merit.edu
> 
> 
> I'm willing to bet that Cisco's sales team is pushing back a little on
> this enhancement.  Given the choice between prolonging the usefulness of
> Sup2 for another year or two versus selling a massive amount of new
> Sup720-3BXLs, I'm betting they'll do the later.

Yes, but higher management should understand that when customers feel
that they are being forced to buy expensive hardware because a software
"fix" is deemed bad for sales, they are likely to buy someone other
companies products.
-- 
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: oberman at es.net			Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4  EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 224 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20070912/c32533d9/attachment.sig>