Congestion control train-wreck workshop at Stanford: Call for Demos
dot at dotat.at
Tue Sep 4 14:09:52 UTC 2007
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Stephen Stuart wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Tony Finch wrote:
> > On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Sean Donelan wrote:
> > >
> > > Operators are probably more interested in the "fairness" part of
> > > "congestion" than the "efficiency" part of "congestion."
> > TCP's idea of fairness is a bit weird. Shouldn't it be per-user, not
> > per-flow?
> How would you define "user" in that context?
Given that we're trusting the user's OS to implement congestion control,
it seems reasonable to trust it to define per-user in a sensible way.
f.a.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
IRISH SEA: SOUTHERLY, BACKING NORTHEASTERLY FOR A TIME, 3 OR 4. SLIGHT OR
MODERATE. SHOWERS. MODERATE OR GOOD, OCCASIONALLY POOR.
More information about the NANOG