Congestion control train-wreck workshop at Stanford: Call for Demos

Stephen Stuart stuart at
Tue Sep 4 13:42:49 UTC 2007

> On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Sean Donelan wrote:
> >
> > Operators are probably more interested in the "fairness" part of
> > "congestion" than the "efficiency" part of "congestion."
> TCP's idea of fairness is a bit weird. Shouldn't it be per-user, not
> per-flow?

How would you define "user" in that context?


More information about the NANOG mailing list