dual-stack [was: NANOG 40 agenda posted]

Donald Stahl don at calis.blacksun.org
Wed May 30 20:07:19 UTC 2007

> I guess we have different definitions for "most significant backbones". 
> Unless you mean they have a dual-stack router running _somewhere_, say, for 
> instance, at a single IX or a lab LAN or something.  Which is not 
> particularly useful if we are talking about a "significant backbone".
Rather than go back and forth- can we get some real data?

Can anyone comment on the backbone IPv6 status of the major carriers?


More information about the NANOG mailing list