dual-stack [was: NANOG 40 agenda posted]
don at calis.blacksun.org
Wed May 30 20:07:19 UTC 2007
> I guess we have different definitions for "most significant backbones".
> Unless you mean they have a dual-stack router running _somewhere_, say, for
> instance, at a single IX or a lab LAN or something. Which is not
> particularly useful if we are talking about a "significant backbone".
Rather than go back and forth- can we get some real data?
Can anyone comment on the backbone IPv6 status of the major carriers?
More information about the NANOG