dual-stack [was: NANOG 40 agenda posted]
Patrick W. Gilmore
patrick at ianai.net
Wed May 30 19:48:01 UTC 2007
On May 30, 2007, at 3:40 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> This is a grand game of chicken. The ISPs are refusing to move
>> first due to
>> lack of content
> pure bs. most significant backbones are dual stack. you are the
> chicken, claiming the sky is falling.
I guess we have different definitions for "most significant
backbones". Unless you mean they have a dual-stack router running
_somewhere_, say, for instance, at a single IX or a lab LAN or
something. Which is not particularly useful if we are talking about
a "significant backbone".
That said, I certainly don't think content is doing well either. Nor
am I trying to say which is at fault. In fact, not even sure I care
who is at fault, if fault can even be apportioned.
P.S. Don't suppose people could change the subject when, well, the
More information about the NANOG