SaidCom disconnected by Level 3 (former Telcove property)
frnkblk at iname.com
Sat Mar 17 01:59:14 UTC 2007
I've been working at a smaller ISP (~4000 subs, plus businesses), and not
one has asked me if I'm multi-homed.
When we or our upstream provider have a problem the telephones light up and
people act as if it's a problem, but the reality is that they're not
communicating it, up front, as a business requirement.
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 8:54 PM
To: nanog at merit.edu
Subject: Re: SaidCom disconnected by Level 3 (former Telcove property)
Any company, or any person for that matter, that relies on their
Internet connectivity for their lively hood should be multihomed.
On Mar 16, 2007, at 4:42 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> Almost ALL providers should be multihomed.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog at merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog at merit.edu] On
> Behalf Of
> virendra rode //
> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 11:26 AM
> To: NANOG
> Subject: Re: SaidCom disconnected by Level 3 (former Telcove property)
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Frank Bulk wrote:
>> Is this a normal thing for Level 3 to do, cut off small, responsive
> - ------------------------
> Just curious, should "small responsive providers" should be multi-
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v18.104.22.168 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the NANOG