SaidCom disconnected by Level 3 (former Telcove property)
Berkman, Scott
Scott.Berkman at Reignmaker.net
Thu Mar 15 18:39:49 UTC 2007
All companies in all industries have a policy of stopping to provide
their services if a customer stops paying or violates the contract, I
really don't see this as a big/little provider argument.
Yes, the small provider should be multi-homed, otherwise a fiber cut or
outage can have this same effect.
To me the only part of this that is up for argument is did SaidCom
actually violate the contract and/or terms of use, and I certainly don't
have enough information beyond that one article to make that decision.
If someone else does please share with the group.
-Scott
(As always just my 2 cents)
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog at merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog at merit.edu] On Behalf Of
Frank Bulk
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 10:30 PM
To: nanog at merit.edu
Subject: SaidCom disconnected by Level 3 (former Telcove property)
http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/articlePrint.cfm?id=1310151
Is this a normal thing for Level 3 to do, cut off small, responsive
providers?
Frank
More information about the NANOG
mailing list