v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers

Brandon Butterworth brandon at rd.bbc.co.uk
Mon Dec 24 15:28:36 UTC 2007

> I thought we were all trying to discourage NAT in IPv6.  Clearly, NAT
> solves the problem ... while introducing 1000 new ones.  :-/

Clearly some have been trying to discourage NAT in IPv6
ensuring there'll be a 1000 problems if anyone tries.

> I mean, yeah, it'd be great if we could mandate /48 ...  but I just can't
> see it as likely to happen.

If people are supposed to have a /48 then the allocation rules
should say that's what they will get.

It may be xmas but it's not wise to rely on the benevolence of ISPs


More information about the NANOG mailing list