"2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey.
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
Thu Aug 30 04:47:57 UTC 2007
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 06:48:43PM -0400, Jon Lewis wrote:
>
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, David Conrad wrote:
>
> >For a few more months. What are upgrade cycles like again? How common
> >are the MSFC2s?
>
> I think we'll find out in a few months, when the "internet breaks" in a
> whole bunch of places where the admins aren't aware of this issue or
> operations have been downsized to the point that things are mostly on
> auto-pilot. I'm guessing there are a good number of Sup2's in use, and
> that a good % of them think they're fine...as they have 512MB RAM and on
> the software based routers, that's plenty for current full BGP routes.
private replies suggest (w/ lots of handwaving) that perhaps 20-35%
of the forwarding engines in use might fit this catagory.
> Anyone want to bet there will be people posting to nanog and cisco-nsp in
> a few months asking why either the CPU load on their Sup2's has suddenly
> shot up or why they keep noticing parts of the internet have gone
> unreachable?...oblivious to this thread.
that would be a sucker bet
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Jon Lewis | I route
--bill
More information about the NANOG
mailing list