IPv6 Finally gets off the ground

Tue Apr 10 19:05:20 UTC 2007

Yes. Silly of you. I think you may have missed more than the singular  
reference.

This back and forth has little to do with morality and more to do  
with opinion.

Yet it begs, how moral is an argument of 'my opinion is superior to  
your opinion'?

Such a lashing of another's opinion under the pretense of removing  
someone from their lofty perch to restore equality is hardly equality  
at all.

Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Though, I doubt Mr. Yao was  
expressing his so strongly.

Gian Anthony Constantine

On Apr 10, 2007, at 1:35 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:

>
> On Apr 10, 2007, at 1:24 PM, Joseph S D Yao wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 12:10:59PM -0400, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>> ...
>>> Second, who said v6 was "the heights"?  ...
>>
>> My, aren't we serious?  Too serious to realize that satellites are a
>> little higher than I, at least, can reach.
>
> Guess I missed that reference.  Silly of me.  Fine imagery.  Just  
> like the stuff you can get for free if you use a v6 stack.... :)
>
> As for being serious, I do believe you were the one who claimed v6  
> was going "into the gutter", and "the depth".  Pot, kettle, black?   
> Actually, you went beyond being serious by implying some type of  
> moral superiority.
>
> Which is fine, you packets can be morally superior to mine....
>
> -- 
> TTFN,
> patrick
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20070410/0feea018/attachment.html>