200K prefixes - Weekly Routing Table Report
adrian at creative.net.au
Sat Oct 14 02:08:27 UTC 2006
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006, Fergie wrote:
> I'll bet you nickels to doughnuts that it won't make much
> of a difference -- in the fact that too may end-ASs originate
> specifics to attempt to "engineer" their traffic....
You could always send those networks a bill for your next BGP-speaking
core upgrade. TCAM entries are expensive y'know.
>From what I've seen here and other lists there seems to be a good
financial reason now to aggregate thanks to implementation choices
by vendors and purchasing choices by providers.
Adrian (239k is enough for everyone, or something.)
More information about the NANOG