Cogent and Sprint peering history?

nealr neal at lists.rauhauser.net
Fri Nov 17 23:46:43 UTC 2006



I've not watched here closely for a number of years, but I now have a 
Sprint connected customer who is hating life and Cogent seems to be part 
of the equation. Can someone fill me in on the history of their 
relationship?



> I never thought Sprint would ever renew its relationship with Sprint:
>
> Tracing the route to portus.netsecdesign.com (66.6.208.6)
>  
>    1 sl-bb24-rly-9-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.14.122) 0 msec 0 msec 0
> msec
>    2 sl-st22-ash-6-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.20.189) 0 msec 4 msec 0
> msec
>    3 p15-2.core01.iad01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.13.61) [AS 174] 4
> msec 4 msec 0 msec
>    4 v3492-mpd01.iad01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.3.222) [AS 174] 16
> msec 80 msec 196 msec
>    5 v3497.mpd01.dca01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.5.65) [AS 174] 4 msec
> 4 msec 4 msec
>    6 t9-3.mpd01.iah01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.2.222) [AS 174] 44 msec
> 44 msec 48 msec
>    7 t2-3.mpd01.lax01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.3.186) [AS 174] 72 msec
> 72 msec 72 msec
>    8 g2-0-0.core01.lax01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.2.101) [AS 174] 72
> msec 72 msec 72 msec
>    9 g49.ba01.b002698-1.lax01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.250.12.130) [AS
> 174] 72 msec 72 msec 72 msec
>   10 PAJO-Networks.demarc.cogentco.com (38.112.9.190) [AS 174] 72 msec
> 76 msec 72 msec
>   11 dcap04.pcap.lax01.tierzero.net (216.31.128.14) [AS 11509] 72 msec
> 76 msec 72 msec
>   12 mmic-gw.dcap6.lax.us.tierzero.net (216.31.188.94) [AS 11509] 76
> msec 80 msec 80 msec
>   13 dazedandconfused.netsecdesign.com (66.6.208.4) [AS 11509] 84 msec
> 84 msec 88 msec
>   14 portus.netsecdesign.com (66.6.208.6) [AS 11509] 84 msec 84 msec 88
> msec
>
>
> Next I will see pigs flying :)  Wonder how long it will last based on
> Cogent's past behavior as noted here.
>
> Edward Ray
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> This mail was scanned by BitDefender
> For more informations please visit http://www.bitdefender.com
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>   




More information about the NANOG mailing list