MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain

Peter Dambier peter at peter-dambier.de
Mon May 15 09:11:28 UTC 2006


Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com wrote:
>>>But there's no technical advantage of a hierarchical system over a
>>>simple hashing scheme, they're basically isomorphic other than a hash
>>>system can more easily be tuned to a particular distribution goal.
>>
>>Amazing how many experienced people seem to be saying this isn't 
> 
> possible, 
> 
>>given there are already schemes out there using flat namespaces for 
> 
> large 
> 
>>problems (e.g. Skype, freenet, various file sharing systems). Most of 
> 
> these 
> 
>>are also far more dynamic than the DNS in nature, and most have no 
> 
> management 
> 
>>overhead with them, you run the software and the namespace "just works".

djbdns with its hashing technique could do that but Bind 9 would break.

There is still the problem wich single point would manage that database.

> 
> 
> According to your description, this is a hierarchical naming
> system. At the top level you have Skype, freenet, etc.
> defining separate namespaces. Because DNS was intended to be
> a universal naming system, it had to incorporate the hierarchy
> into the system.
> 
> 
>>However I think the pain in DNS for most people is the hierarchy, but 
> 
> the 
> 
>>diverse  registration systems. i.e. It isn't that it is delegated, it is 
> 
> that 
> 
>>delegates all "do their own thing".
> 
> 
> Seems to me that this is part of the definition
> of "delegate". Some would say that this makes for
> a more robust system than a monolithic hierarchy
> where everyone has to toe the party line.
> 
> 
>>I've always pondered doing a flat, simple part of the DNS, or even 
>>an overlay, 
>>but of course it needs a business model of sorts.
> 
> 
> It has been tried at least twice and failed.
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/05/13/realnames_goes_titsup_com/
> http://www.idcommons.net
> 
> --Michael Dillon
> 
> 

It seems to work now. Just google for

Apple: Rendezvous and Bonjour

There are libs for linux and Microsoft too.

Both Rendezvous and Bonjour are working.

There is an incompatible version from Microsoft too, some say
it is vaporware but I can still their queries for '.local' on
our nameservers.


Cheers
Peter and Karin Dambier

-- 
Peter and Karin Dambier
The Public-Root Consortium
Graeffstrasse 14
D-64646 Heppenheim
+49(6252)671-788 (Telekom)
+49(179)108-3978 (O2 Genion)
+49(6252)750-308 (VoIP: sipgate.de)
mail: peter at peter-dambier.de
mail: peter at echnaton.serveftp.com
http://iason.site.voila.fr/
https://sourceforge.net/projects/iason/




More information about the NANOG mailing list