Hyunseog Ryu r.hyunseog at
Sat Feb 18 01:36:16 UTC 2006

Maybe next monday I can ask for detailed info, but I wasn't on the
meeting to discuss this in detail.
Based on outcome of discussion with Cisco, we decided to go with MLFR
instead of MLPPP.


Jon R. Kibler wrote:
> Hyunseog Ryu wrote:
>> What I heard from Cisco is that there may be some issue with MLPPP and
>> MPLS - maybe QoS? -.
>> The issue is for general IOS support issue for MLPPP/MPLS combination.
>> For that reason, Cisco recommended Multi-link Frame Relay(MLFR) to
>> overcome that issue.
>> Hyun
> Hyun, 
> Would you happen to have a source for additional information as to exactly what the problem may be? 
> Jon Kibler

More information about the NANOG mailing list