MLPPP over MPLS
xenophage0 at gmail.com
Sat Feb 18 14:10:01 UTC 2006
On 2/17/06, Hyunseog Ryu <r.hyunseog at ieee.org> wrote:
> Maybe next monday I can ask for detailed info, but I wasn't on the
> meeting to discuss this in detail.
> Based on outcome of discussion with Cisco, we decided to go with MLFR
> instead of MLPPP.
Any idea if this issue is just another unfixed bug, or is it something deeper?
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
XenoPhage0 at gmail.com
More information about the NANOG