Utah considers law to mandate ISP's block "harmful" sites

Fri Mar 4 16:06:28 UTC 2005

On Mar 4, 2005, at 11:00 AM, Roy Engehausen wrote:

> You missed a very important line in the article:
>
> "Internet providers in Utah must offer their customers a way to 
> disable access to sites on the list or face felony charges."
>
> In other words you must provide a mechanism for a customer to "opt-in" 
> to a filter.  Doesn't sound illegal to force an ISP to provide a 
> feature.

Would "unplug your cable" qualify as a "way to disable access"?

-- 
TTFN,
patrick