Utah considers law to mandate ISP's block "harmful" sites
Roy Engehausen
garlic at garlic.com
Fri Mar 4 16:00:41 UTC 2005
You missed a very important line in the article:
"Internet providers in Utah must offer their customers a way to disable
access to sites on the list or face felony charges."
In other words you must provide a mechanism for a customer to "opt-in"
to a filter. Doesn't sound illegal to force an ISP to provide a feature.
Roy
Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
>On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
>
>
>
>>"The Utah governor is deciding whether to sign a
>>bill that would require Internet providers to block
>>Web sites deemed pornographic and that could also
>>target e-mail providers and search engines."
>>
>>http://news.com.com/Utah+governor+weighs+antiporn+proposal/2100-1028_3-5598912.html?tag=nefd.top
>>
>>
>
>Someone might consider pointing them to the law from the state of PA that
>did similar things... Then point them at the overturning of that law.
>
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list