URPF on small BGP-enabled customers?

Joe Abley jabley at isc.org
Fri Jun 3 14:44:45 UTC 2005



On 2005-06-03, at 10:26, Andre Oppermann wrote:

>
> christian.macnevin at uk.bnpparibas.com wrote:
>
>> I guess it's been a while since I've played with it, but isn't  
>> this pretty
>> well what happens with uRPF anyhow?
>>
>
> No, my proposal works as long as the customer advertizes their  
> prefixes
> via BGP, not matter how long the path or what community attributes are
> set (for example NOEXPORT).  No matter how they send it, as long as  
> they
> send it, it works fine.

So, your proposal is loose-mode uRPF?




More information about the NANOG mailing list