URPF on small BGP-enabled customers?
Joe Abley
jabley at isc.org
Fri Jun 3 14:44:45 UTC 2005
On 2005-06-03, at 10:26, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>
> christian.macnevin at uk.bnpparibas.com wrote:
>
>> I guess it's been a while since I've played with it, but isn't
>> this pretty
>> well what happens with uRPF anyhow?
>>
>
> No, my proposal works as long as the customer advertizes their
> prefixes
> via BGP, not matter how long the path or what community attributes are
> set (for example NOEXPORT). No matter how they send it, as long as
> they
> send it, it works fine.
So, your proposal is loose-mode uRPF?
More information about the NANOG
mailing list