RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178
Petri Helenius
pete at he.iki.fi
Sat Sep 4 20:27:23 UTC 2004
Bill Woodcock wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> > the logic seems rather irrefutable:
> > - as a rule, shorter prefixes are more important and/or more stable
> > than long ones
> > - so we dampen long prefixes more aggressively
> > - the root DNS servers tend to live in long prefixes
> > - so we exclude the root DNS prefixes
>
>What about the ccTLD prefixes? There are a lot more of them. And the
>gTLDs? And exchange points? And Microsoft Update servers? Where do you
>stop?
>
>
>
Pay me to treat your prefixes more nicely? 1/2 :-)
Pete
More information about the NANOG
mailing list