RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178
Bill Woodcock
woody at pch.net
Sat Sep 4 19:37:04 UTC 2004
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> the logic seems rather irrefutable:
> - as a rule, shorter prefixes are more important and/or more stable
> than long ones
> - so we dampen long prefixes more aggressively
> - the root DNS servers tend to live in long prefixes
> - so we exclude the root DNS prefixes
What about the ccTLD prefixes? There are a lot more of them. And the
gTLDs? And exchange points? And Microsoft Update servers? Where do you
stop?
-Bill
More information about the NANOG
mailing list