Pay-As-You-Use High-Speed Internet?
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Mon May 17 11:08:52 UTC 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 2004-05-14, at 23.34, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
> On Fri, 14 May 2004 17:22:03 EDT, "Jonathan M. Slivko"
> <jslivko at invisiblehand.net> said:
>> Personally, I would like to see a senario where everyone just pays for
>> what they use - it would be a much better system for allowing people
>> Questions? Comments? Suggestions?
> Who pays for a DDoS attack, or getting flooded by bounces from a
> joe-job or A/V companies warning spam when somebody else's box spoofs
> e-mail address?
> If they have a website, who pays how much if it's slashdotted?
> question there - I may have budgeted for only several hundred or a
> hits a day, and if 200K hits costs too much, I may be in trouble...)
> How do you handle disputes? Who has the burden of proof?
> Those are all questions I'd be asking as a potential customer..
> And the biggie for you is: How do you handle these issues on a low
> margin? ;)
Back in the days, before DDOS and massive spamming, I worked for an ISP
where we used this. Actually we used a much more elaborate scheme with
different tariffs based on source / destination. It actually worked
well enough to get quite a good uptake. Especially for users that had a
lot of national / local traffic (which was cheaper to produce and
cheaper for the user). Worth noting is that we where transit free.
I used to think this was the billing model of the future, however I
changed my mind. Not because of any of the reasons you state, but
because of this just being another version of bandwidth payment. For
the problem with all similar technologies, QoS, dial-on-demand lambdas
etc is that the original builder/producer of the service needs to
depreciate/pay even when you don't use the service, which is either
reflected in the price or in the SLAs. Neither of which seems as a very
good business model.
- - kurtis -
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the NANOG