[Fwd: [IP] Feds: VoIP a potential haven for terrorists]

Curtis Maurand curtis at maurand.com
Mon Jun 21 21:13:43 UTC 2004



It won't make any difference.  Anyone (barring complete idiots) will 
encrypt the traffic with long keys.

Curtis

--
Curtis Maurand
mailto:curtis at maurand.com
http://www.maurand.com


On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Hannigan, Martin wrote:

>
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-nanog at merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog at merit.edu]On Behalf Of
>> Sean Donelan
>> Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 10:25 PM
>> To: Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP
>> Cc: Steven M. Bellovin; Jim Dempsey (E-mail); North American Noise and
>> Off-topic Gripes
>> Subject: RE: [Fwd: [IP] Feds: VoIP a potential haven for terrorists]
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 19 Jun 2004, Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP wrote:
>
> [SNIP]
>
>
>>
>> A SPAN port could satisfy an ISP's obligations under
>> TitleIII/ECPA, but
>> not satisfy CALEA.
>
>
> What is required is TCAP information and bearer traffic. Typically
> delivered off the switch back to the LEA collector via a DS0. The
> TCAP information can be delivered in a multitude of ways.
>



More information about the NANOG mailing list