more on VeriSign to revive redirect service

Thu Oct 16 15:53:14 UTC 2003

On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 10:16:53 CDT, Andrew D Kirch <trelane at trelane.net>  said:
> I would certainly say there's an elitism, or perhaps a higher level of
> credibility given to a .com or .net site, due to the fact that they've probably
> existed for quite a bit longer than a .biz or .info.

Most of my spam points back to .com addresses.  Not much credibility generated
there...

There's sufficient churn on the bottom-feeding .com's that it's not a reliable
indicator.  Now you want *stability*, look for a site that's got a .arpa other than
in-addr.arpa :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20031016/f947f2fa/attachment.sig>