Extreme BlackDiamond

Steve Francis steve at expertcity.com
Mon Oct 13 21:42:17 UTC 2003


Tom (UnitedLayer) wrote:

>On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 sthaug at nethelp.no wrote:
>  
>
>>Maybe you could expand on the BGP scanner problems - we haven't seen
>>them all the time we've been running 6500 native with full routes (about
>>1.5 years now).
>>    
>>
>
>BGP Scanner taking up close to 100% of CPU on a box periodically.
>GSR doesn't seem to do it, but a buncha other cisco boxes do.
>Its more irritating than anything else, especially when customers complain
>that when they traceroute they see ~200ms latency to the router...
>  
>
Doesn't happen here with MSFC2/SupII.

Maybe just MSFC1's that are subject to that.




More information about the NANOG mailing list