Extreme BlackDiamond

Tom (UnitedLayer) tom at unitedlayer.com
Mon Oct 13 21:15:59 UTC 2003


On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 sthaug at nethelp.no wrote:
> Maybe you could expand on the BGP scanner problems - we haven't seen
> them all the time we've been running 6500 native with full routes (about
> 1.5 years now).

BGP Scanner taking up close to 100% of CPU on a box periodically.
GSR doesn't seem to do it, but a buncha other cisco boxes do.
Its more irritating than anything else, especially when customers complain
that when they traceroute they see ~200ms latency to the router...




More information about the NANOG mailing list