223.255.255.0/24

Mon Feb 24 04:49:05 UTC 2003

> 
> 
> > The outcome of the discussions at the Address Policy SIG will be posted
> > to this list.
> 
> where, one hopes, discussion will continue, yes?
> 
> randy
> 
	why would an APNIC/AP region specific issue need to be discussed
	on the NANOG list and not the RIPE/AFNOG/et.al. regional ops lists?
	This is a prefix delegated to the APregion and so they should be
	the ones who set the policies for the prefixes they are responsible
	for. I appreciate their willingness to share the outcome of their
	deliberations, but why NAites have any special say in AP policies
	is a bit beyond me.

--bill