Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX

Jesper Skriver jesper at skriver.dk
Sun Nov 17 18:55:29 UTC 2002


On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 08:45:07PM -0500, Sean Donelan wrote:

> In the 1990's the MAEs and Gigaswitches would give us an unscheduled
> failure of a major exchange point on a regular basis, which let us
> demostrate our disaster recovery capabilities.  With the improved
> reliability, i.e. the PAIXes haven't had a catastrophic failure, we
> haven't had as many opportunities to demonstrate how well we can
> handle a disaster at those locations.
>
> Without creating an actual disaster, what if all the providers turned
> off their BGP sessions with other providers at a PAIX (or Equinix
> or LINX or where ever), both through the shared switch and private
> point-to-point links, for an hour.  More than likely no one would
> notice, but then we would have some hard data.  Individually providers
> have tested parts of their own network, but I haven't heard of any
> coordinated efforts to test recovery across all the service providers
> in a particular location.

There was a major power outage in Amsterdam on November 6th, which took
down the power at 2 major housing locations (Nikhef and SARA), which
house the original 2 AMS-IX sites, and lots of routers.

Even though Amsterdam (and AMS-IX) is a major hub for european
connections, most worked as usual, though some Dutch destinations has
higher than normal delay and packet loss.

/Jesper

-- 
Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk  -  CCIE #5456
Senior network engineer @ AS3292, TDC Tele Danmark

One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them,
One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.



More information about the NANOG mailing list