Cisco 7200 VXR with NPE-400 (was RE: The market must be coming back)

Gary garyb at foundrynet.com
Tue May 21 05:12:25 UTC 2002


Adam:

> [...] Sort of like buying a GbE interface for a 7200 (It only get's
> > 10% throughput...  Why waste the money, just buy FE!).
>
> How did the Foundry test lab arrive at those figures, and what
> substances were consumed at the time?

I used a Cisco 7200 VXR with NPE-400.  I used two different 7200's with the
exact same results.  Bidirectional throughput on 1GbE is a fraction above
10%.  Unidirectional is a bit better (23%).  Singl line ACL drops it to 8%
(permit ip any any).  FE performance doesn't start to drop below line rate
until you put more than two in the box.  I have a powerpoint if you'd like
it, but it is not meant to slander Cisco, just to convince my customers NOT
to put GbE in a 7200!  It is not a GbE platform!

> I'd say 300+ mbit/sec on a PA-GE is a more accurate real-world limit,
> assuming you've got plenty of spare CPU cycles to burn, and no ACL's.
>
> Besides, that's really an apples to oranges comparison.  I don't think
> anyone, including Cisco, has ever made the claim that it can do line
> rate GbE; that's not to say it isn't useful for certain topologies
> requiring slightly-faster-than-fast-e router<->switch uplinks, etc.

My powerpoint compares the 7200 with the FastIron 4802 Premium.  It is line
rate with less than 7 us latency on the two GbE ports.  I tested this
myself.  I can forward this to you if you like.  It is a bunch of SmartApps
screen captures of the testing.

I really like the 7200 VXR.  It is a good 10M and minimum FE platform.  It
can switch DS0 on the midplane and it supports a wide array of interfaces!
I just don't like to see it oversubsribed.  Many of our customers use the
7200 and have nothing bad to say about it when deployed properly.

Gary




More information about the NANOG mailing list