Large ISPs doing NAT?

Marshall Eubanks tme at multicasttech.com
Mon Apr 29 16:26:49 UTC 2002


On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 09:08:16 -0700
 Beckmeyer <beck at pacbell.net> wrote:
> 
> Marshall et al,
> 

Dear JB;

1.) Dare I suggest that you use IPv6 ? It should make a
great NAT.

2.) If you are interested in having content put on your
wireless devices I would like to talk off line.

Regards
Marshall Eubanks


> It's a lack of IP Address Space - and the numbers I gave
> - 10's of 
> thousands are probably a bit on the small side - in short
> order it will 
> be multiples of 100,000 IP addresses.  To start with, I'm
> willing to 
> think in terms of 10's of thousands spread over a handful
> of "POPs".
> 
> The application is GPRS (aka 2.5/3G cellular) and each
> Internet 
> connected user or some major subset of them will likely
> wind up with an 
> address on their mobile device.  
> 
> - JB
> 




More information about the NANOG mailing list