IXs

Rich Sena ras at poppa.thick.net
Sun Feb 25 19:45:00 UTC 2001



I was under the impression that this was going to be transitioned out (at
least that is what my WorldCom rep told me about a year ago)...


On Feb 25, 2001 Josh Richards spake:

> Anyone give me an idea of what sort of traffic passes to (and hopefully 
> thru!) their MAE-LA peers?  It's hard to tell whether anyone cares about
> this NAP or not, and there appears to be significantly less potential 
> peering partners connected to it.  Makes for a tough ROI argument when 
> compared to the other NAPs.  While I realize some of this might be a 
> critical mass issue, MAE-LA seems to have been fairly stagnant for several
> years now.  
> 
> While we're at it, have any input on PacBell's NAP? :-) 
> 
> BTW: Anyone considering connecting to Telehouse's 6IIX IPv6 exchange points
> at this point?  They are collocated inside with NYIIX and LAIIX. 
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -jr
> 
> ----
> Josh Richards [JTR38/JR539-ARIN]
> <jrichard at geekresearch.com/cubicle.net/fix.net/freedom.gen.ca.us>
> Geek Research LLC - <URL:http://www.geekresearch.com/>
> IP Network Engineering and Consulting
> 

-- 
Rich Sena - ras at thick.net
ThickNET Consulting
"On the way to understanding; you understand, and forget."






More information about the NANOG mailing list