Bind 8.2 Remote-shell Exploit is actually trojan to attack NAI

John Fraizer nanog at EnterZone.Net
Thu Feb 1 12:01:02 UTC 2001


On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Charles Sprickman wrote:

> 
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Henry R. Linneweh wrote:
> 
> > I understand that, the issue I had with this is in the presentation
> > "Major net security holes identified", Should have read "Major net
> > security holes fixed " this would have been fair to Paul and crew.
> > is all I am saying.....
> 
> I think that with the remote-shell exploit just released on Bugtraq the
> next article will have to revert to "Major security hole found - chaos
> ensues".
> 

Well, in typical Bugtraq script-loser fashion, the remote-shell exploit
was actually a trojan to attack NAI:

\xa1\x45\x03\x96  ==  161.69.3.150 == dns1.nai.com

So, it turns out it's not too aweful bad of a day (unless you're NAI) and
at least you still have a few minutes before a _real_ remote-shell exploit
is released.

---
John Fraizer
EnterZone, Inc






More information about the NANOG mailing list