Faster 'Net growth rate raises fears about routers

Mon Apr 2 22:14:40 UTC 2001

> From: Bill Woodcock [mailto:woody at zocalo.net]
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 2:51 PM
> 
>       On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Roeland Meyer wrote:
>     > From what I just went through (DSLnetworks v Covad), 
> this is straight
>     > bulldust. Had I been properly multi-homed, MHSC would 
> NOT have been down for
>     > 5 weeks.
> 
> Patrik said ISPs, not IAPs.

So, please explain to me how not being multi-homed is anything other than a
bad-thing and high-risk? No, I am not including colo, because it is assumed
that you know what their arrangements are before you "buy". Reputable colos
are multi-homed, in spades.