a different view of SNMP
Mr. James W. Laferriere
babydr at baby-dragons.com
Sun Sep 5 17:33:53 UTC 1999
Helo Bryan ,
On Sun, 5 Sep 1999 bandregg at redhat.com wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Sep 1999 19:49:14 PDT, "Ron Buchalski" wrote:
> >>I sometimes wonder why Wellfleet nee Bay nee Nortel haven't already
> >>taken over most of Cisco's market share for this reason given their
> >>almost total embracement of SNMP for configuration and management.
> >>Sure, they did leave a wide market niche for third party font-end tools
> >>that actually worked, but at least they embraced the standards! :-)
> >Well, could it be because Cisco routers _work_? :-)
> Or that you don't have to use that piece of crap called Configuration Mangler
> to deal with the thing and then pay for upgrades to a version of configuration
> software that doesn't leave the equipment in a bad state.
Now that Nortel is in charge that is the case 'pay pay pay'
When I worked at NWRain.net we had a BLN in use . When it
was put into service the way to get SMxxx was to just ftp
to their site & grab the latest 'production' version .
If you had a Maint. Contract just call & ask for the lastest
service group patched version ... that of course was before
Nortel started providing 'Improved' services to it customers .
Jusy My ~.03 worth , JimL
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| James W. Laferriere | System Techniques | Give me VMS |
| Network Engineer | 25416 22nd So | Give me Linux |
| babydr at baby-dragons.com | DesMoines WA 98198 | only on AXP |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
More information about the NANOG
mailing list