a different view of SNMP
Alex P. Rudnev
alex at Relcom.EU.net
Mon Sep 6 10:35:26 UTC 1999
It's _not the joke_ - a lot folks here prefere CISCO to WellFleet just
because they dod not need to get GUI program, bring laptop with them and
bother about upgrades. And _npw_ CISCO haveeasy WWW interface as the
GUI-SNMP killer, as well.
PS. BUt it's amazing - I thought everyone use the first september weekend
to rest - it appear the people use this day to make a piece
of philosophy -:).
On Sun, 5 Sep 1999 bandregg at redhat.com wrote:
> Date: Sun, 05 Sep 1999 09:46:43 -0400
> From: bandregg at redhat.com
> To: Ron Buchalski <rbuchals at hotmail.com>
> Cc: nanog at merit.edu
> Subject: Re: a different view of SNMP
> On Sat, 04 Sep 1999 19:49:14 PDT, "Ron Buchalski" wrote:
> >>I sometimes wonder why Wellfleet nee Bay nee Nortel haven't already
> >>taken over most of Cisco's market share for this reason given their
> >>almost total embracement of SNMP for configuration and management.
> >>Sure, they did leave a wide market niche for third party font-end tools
> >>that actually worked, but at least they embraced the standards! :-)
> >Well, could it be because Cisco routers _work_? :-)
> Or that you don't have to use that piece of crap called Configuration Mangler
> to deal with the thing and then pay for upgrades to a version of configuration
> software that doesn't leave the equipment in a bad state.
> Bryan C. Andregg * <bandregg at redhat.com> * Red Hat, Inc.
> 1024/625FA2C5 F5 F3 DC 2E 8E AF 26 B0 2C 31 78 C2 6C FB 02 77
> 1024/0x46E7A8A2 46EB 61B1 71BD 2960 723C 38B6 21E4 23CC 46E7 A8A2
Aleksei Roudnev, Network Operations Center, Relcom, Moscow
(+7 095) 194-19-95 (Network Operations Center Hot Line),(+7 095) 230-41-41, N 13729 (pager)
(+7 095) 196-72-12 (Support), (+7 095) 194-33-28 (Fax)
More information about the NANOG