ANNOUNCE -- New RADB Fee Structure

Tue Oct 26 17:02:10 UTC 1999

Speaking about the mirroring... in Russion, we are
saying 'the road to the hell is build from the holy intentions' (sure
there exist something like in English too).

An Internet is the very thin and complex system, and today RA-DB is an
important part of it. Playing games with the 'authomatic-removing' can
cause the dangerous results. 

On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, Chris Cappuccio wrote:

> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 08:23:24 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Chris Cappuccio <chris at dqc.org>
> To: Joe Shaw <jshaw at insync.net>
> Cc: Alex P. Rudnev <alex at virgin.relcom.eu.net>,
     Craig Labovitz <labovit at merit.edu>, nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Re: ** ANNOUNCE -- New RADB Fee Structure **
> 
> 
> On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, Joe Shaw wrote:
> 
>  | I concur with you.  It's much safer to just block all changes to objects
>  | that haven't been paid for instead of outright deleting them.  Not to cast
>  | aspersions upon Merit, but the last thing we need is a registry that makes
>  | mistakes like NSI has done to many in the past.
>  | 
> 
> Merit will mirror your registry if you setup one of the radb-type
> daemons.  They will do this at no charge.  Offer free services to your
> downstream.  Or, maybe Qwest will start doing this, ask one of the tech
> people!
> 
> 
> 

Aleksei Roudnev, Network Operations Center, Relcom, Moscow
(+7 095) 194-19-95 (Network Operations Center Hot Line),(+7 095) 230-41-41, N 13729 (pager)
(+7 095) 196-72-12 (Support), (+7 095) 194-33-28 (Fax)