Route-Reflector Redundancy

Andrew R Frame aframe at employees.org
Wed Jun 30 03:43:09 UTC 1999



On Tue, 29 Jun 1999, Brandon Applegate wrote:

> 
> Greetings all,
> 
> In a redundant RR design, I have several questions that don't seem to be
> clearly covered in RFC1966.
> 
> 1)	Does a given route-reflector have to peer with the other
> 	route-reflectors in its own cluster ??

yes

> 
> 2)	If yes to 1), do the RRs in the cluster peer with each other as
> 	clients or non-clients ??

non-clients

> 
> 3)	If no to all of the above, do you just put X numbers of route
> 	reflectors into the AS and each client etc. in the cluster now
> 	peers with X # of RR's ?
> 
> Above and beyond all of the above (actually depending on all of the above
> :) ), if my client router hears something from RR1, will it also hear it
> from RR2 ??  Is there a race condition ? 

Why dont you setup multiple clusters and have one rr for each cluster? it
is possible to have more then one rr per cluster.. but i dont know if this
is what you want to do.


latah,
-andrew

> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> --------------------------------------------------
> Brandon Applegate, CCNA  :  Network Administrator
> http://www.one.net       :  brandon at one.net
> --------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 





More information about the NANOG mailing list