Route-Reflector Redundancy
Andrew R Frame
aframe at employees.org
Wed Jun 30 03:43:09 UTC 1999
On Tue, 29 Jun 1999, Brandon Applegate wrote:
>
> Greetings all,
>
> In a redundant RR design, I have several questions that don't seem to be
> clearly covered in RFC1966.
>
> 1) Does a given route-reflector have to peer with the other
> route-reflectors in its own cluster ??
yes
>
> 2) If yes to 1), do the RRs in the cluster peer with each other as
> clients or non-clients ??
non-clients
>
> 3) If no to all of the above, do you just put X numbers of route
> reflectors into the AS and each client etc. in the cluster now
> peers with X # of RR's ?
>
> Above and beyond all of the above (actually depending on all of the above
> :) ), if my client router hears something from RR1, will it also hear it
> from RR2 ?? Is there a race condition ?
Why dont you setup multiple clusters and have one rr for each cluster? it
is possible to have more then one rr per cluster.. but i dont know if this
is what you want to do.
latah,
-andrew
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> Brandon Applegate, CCNA : Network Administrator
> http://www.one.net : brandon at one.net
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list