spam whore, norcal-systems.net
George Herbert
gherbert at crl.com
Mon Feb 1 23:26:59 UTC 1999
This posting, may perhaps not be a nanog charter violation,
though the thread is highly borderline. Please don't shoot me.
Ravi described a packet filter, not monitoring or intercept.
Blocking traffic doesn't constitute unauthorized examination,
intercept, or access of email. You are welcome to attempt to
establish otherwise in a court case, Dean, but your interpretation
appears completely inconsistent with existing case law, attorneys
interpretations, and the intent of the statute. Again.
-george william herbert
gherbert at crl.com I don't work for CRL, speak for it, or anything else.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list