RBL Update (Re: Lets go vixie!! rbl)
J.D. Falk
jdfalk at cp.net
Wed Jun 17 19:58:19 UTC 1998
On 06/16/98, Derek Balling <dredd at megacity.org> wrote:
> I would have to agree with this, but I would say that the caveat is that
> the ISP should notify the customer (somewhere, anywhere) that they use the
> RBL (or at least that the ISP reserves the right to block domains and/or
> hosts from connecting/sending to the mail server). It can be in the fine
> print of the multi-page AUP that the customer gets shoved under their nose,
> but it should be in there.
So far, the consensus seems to be that an ISP should notify
their customers of any filtering policies. In fact, I have
yet to see anybody disagree.
So why are we continuing this argument?
--
J.D. Falk <jdfalk at cp.net>
Special Agent In Charge (Abuse Issues)
Critical Path, Inc.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list