Transparent Caching Solutions - Information Wanted
Dirk Harms-Merbitz
dirk at hermosa.power.net
Wed Feb 4 18:24:32 UTC 1998
In our case it was a company that creates webpages. Their default
home pages was their own server. Also they must be demoing/doing
quality control their own site quite a bit.
Hmm. Targeted marketing...
Dirk
On Wed, Feb 04, 1998 at 08:30:22AM -0800, Paul A Vixie wrote:
> several folks have sent replies to me personally which may be of general
> interest:
>
> > Hit rates are user population dependent. We have seen hit rates
> > as high as 30% from a single T1 connected customer (with a population
> > of less then 500 people).
>
> so have we. but that was a computer club with its own POP and they were
> mostly sharing interesting (i.e., pornographic) URL's over an IRC back
> channel.
>
> we've got ~80 transparent caching units out in the field, and most of them
> are in "normal" modem pools where the users don't know each other and the
> communitities of interest have broader splay.
>
> > ... in some special cases you really can predict what would best be in the
> > cache beforehand. You then win from a speed standpoint (pre fetched data
> > is served up faster).
>
> yes, that's true -- in some special cases you can exercise prescience and
> if you can then the hit rate goes up by a lot as does the downstream data
> rate.
>
> however, to make this work you have to continuously feed the primary caches
> new prescient data (or prescient metadata by which prescient data can be
> fetched). interest factor is in other words dynamic and shortlived.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list