Geographic v. topological address allocation [Was: Re: IPv8 < IPv6]
Paul Ferguson
ferguson at cisco.com
Thu Nov 6 21:47:23 UTC 1997
At 04:35 PM 11/6/97 -0500, Alan Hannan wrote:
>
> The lack of correlation is the exception, in my experience, than
> the rule.
>
I'm not sure I agree, but that's not really the point.
I believe the point is that we should not assume that
they are one and the same. Topology (or as they say in
IPv6-speak, aggregator, next-level-aggregator, etc.) is
quite critical in maintaining sufficient levels of
aggregation.
- paul
More information about the NANOG
mailing list