boardwatch magazine -- hotbed of spammers? irresponsible jerks?
tim at taggnet.skyscape.net
Thu Mar 27 18:15:24 UTC 1997
Sorry you are spam magnet, but I like to read BoardWatch while
taking a dump... been reading for years. TAKE their free copy, push them
that 1 issue closer to bankruptcy.
I pick option 5, after the full issue of BoardWatch dedicated to
anti-spam. They are hipocrits <sp> with maybe Mr. Dixon's superiours
possessing some of 2 and 4 combined due to the lack of training they
provided him. 1 is too harsh and 3 can't comment on without further
screen garbage coming across.
On Thu, 27 Mar 1997, Paul A Vixie wrote:
> miserable scumsucking morons from hell?
> completely unclear on the concept?
> unaware of what NANOG is?
> unaware of what the Internet is?
> you decide. see below.
> for the record, mr. david dixon, i did NOT ask you for any information,
> i am NOT an internet service provider, i do NOT allow this kind of trash
> in my inbox, and your name is now MUD in most of known space. good job.
> see http://www.vix.com/spam/ for background material.
More information about the NANOG