test Nets being routed?
scarter at genuity.net
Wed Dec 24 00:55:19 UTC 1997
I also sent this particular route to the bit bucket (Null0) at NAP.NET having not
hear back from inc.net.....
Matthew D. Lammers wrote:
> The issue from our side has been fixed...I have word that "default" has been
> killed off. Also, noteworthy, that since we weren't getting these routes via
> BGP, filters didn't do much.
> Randy Bush wrote a while back:
> < > and 192.0.0.0/24
> < > or 220.127.116.11/24
> < > or 18.104.22.168/24
> < >
> < > these prefixes (and delegation points) are valid or potentially valid
> < > in the routing system
> < and someday, with enough marketing thrust, pigs could fly. with as many
> < large isps filering these prefixes as there seem to be, and for good
> < historic reason, my advice would be to bet on the pigs. rosenantes is
> < getting nackered.
> < and once again, what the heck is a 'delegation point' in bgp/routing?
> < rfc/document reference, please?
> < randy
> Matthew D. Lammers -- NetSet Internet Solutions, Inc.
More information about the NANOG