peering points
Robert Bowman
rob at elite.exodus.net
Tue Apr 1 18:33:28 UTC 1997
Damnit Sean.. you definitely need to update your list BAD! I mean we
wanted to have an OC12 ring 4 months ago, but MCI refused to give
it to us for free!
Has joining IXPs become a statement of power? I think not. I'll bet
there are just as many ppl on 2 or 3 IXPs that have peering with Sprint as
ppl on 4 or 5. :)
rob
>
> On Tue, 1 Apr 1997, Sean Donelan wrote:
>
> > nathan at netrail.NET (Nathan Stratton) writes:
> > >Well I think NAP's is referring to more then just 1 NAP. There are under 20
> > >providers connected to say 4 or 5 major NAP's.
> >
> > You prodded me into updating my exchange point matrix. I don't claim its
> > perfect, or more up to date than a few minutes ago. Things change quickly
> > in this business.
>
> Well, since you posted this in public I will respond in public.
>
> > Netrail(4006) Y Y Y
>
> You need to update your list BAD. We are connected to all but one of your
> NAPs listed. We wanted to be at Sprint-NAP 4 months ago, but they did not
> have the gigaswitch port, or the physical space for our hardware. Please do
> not put information about other provider up without checking it out first.
>
> NAP Status Speed IP VPI/VCI
> Ameritech-NAP UP DS3 ATM 198.32.130.58 1/34
> Atlanta-NAP UP Full Duplex FDDI 198.32.182.1
> CIX UP Half Duplex FDDI 198.32.176.12
> MAE-East UP Half Duplex FDDI 192.41.177.228
> MAE-West UP Half Duplex FDDI 198.32.136.83
> PACBell UP OC-3 ATM 198.32.128.43 1/34
> PAIX UP Switched Ethernet 198.32.176.12
> Sprint-NAP 4/4/97 FDDI 192.157.69.24
>
>
> Nathan Stratton President, NetRail,Inc.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Phone (888)NetRail NetRail, Inc.
> Fax (404)522-1939 230 Peachtree Suite 500
> WWW http://www.netrail.net/ Atlanta, GA 30303
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> "Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about
> itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." Matthew 6:34
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list