tilting at windmills discussion 2

Wed Jun 19 16:48:28 UTC 1996

Do you also happen to have a breakdown of what ports this raffic was going
to/from?  The reason I ask iss that this seems to lead to a conclusion that
a lot of the data was for "interactive" services such as telnet and the like
as opposed to batch transfer type of connections such as ftp, and sendmail.   

At 03:29 AM 6/19/96 -0400, Dorian Kim wrote:
>On Tue, 18 Jun 1996, Jerry Scharf wrote:
>
>> the overhead for various framing methods. Hopefully taking
>> empirical data from the internet and giving people code will reduce
>> the discussions of what the "cell tax" for real traffic is. Don't
>> like my traffic, collect your own. Fighting over conclusions will
>> be left to others.
>
>In a similar vein, something to think about:
>
>IP packet size distribution (970780293  total packets):
>   1-32   64   96  128  160  192  224  256  288  320  352  384  416  448  480
>   .000 .497 .094 .013 .009 .006 .007 .010 .010 .014 .004 .005 .002 .002 .002
>	^^^^
>    512  544  576 1024 1536 2048 2560 3072 3584 4096 4608
>   .004 .002 .189 .000 .069 .053 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
>
>Collected at a private interconnect between CICNet, OARnet and OSU. over a
>period of a week or so.
>
>-dorian
>
>
>

Justin Newton
Internet Architect
Erol's Internet Services