Paul A Vixie paul at
Wed Aug 16 19:34:52 UTC 1995

> > class c nets, which are 2/3 the total.
> Why can' the NIC reallocat the old class c's and use CIDR?

They are trying.  But you can only lead this horse to water -- we can't take
prefixes away, we can only make them harder or more expensive to get routing
for.  This is a lengthy process, and its success is the only reason we still
have a 30,000 element core routing table -- endpoint growth never stopped, but
new prefixes are all fairly short, and there has been a nearly corresponding
drop in old (long, expensive) prefixes in recent months.  As Randy pointed out,
though, we've probably about squoze all the water out of the old classC sponge.

More information about the NANOG mailing list