mail and IPv6, not The Reg does 240/4
Tim Howe
tim.h at bendtel.com
Thu Feb 15 20:01:21 UTC 2024
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 18:25:03 -0800
Stephen Satchell <list at satchell.net> wrote:
> On 2/14/24 4:23 PM, Tom Samplonius wrote:
> > The best option is what is happening right now: you can’t get new IPv4
> > addresses, so you have to either buy them, or use IPv6. The free market
> > is solving the problem right now. Another solution isn’t needed.
>
> Really? How many mail servers are up on IPv6? How many legacy mail
> clients can handle IPv6? How many MTA software packages can handle IPv6
> today "right out of the box" without specific configuration?
Mine have been dual stack for a while (6 years? 8 years? don't
exactly recall). However, I remember being enough of an early v6
adopter that it was a bit of a challenge to get IPv6 glue records set
up for our DNS servers (that was long before I was brave enough to have
my email servers on v6, though).
> Does any IPv6 enabled ISP provide PTR records for mail servers?
We do, of course, I can't speak for others. We also
sub-delegate on request. However, we are small/local and cater to small
businesses.
> How does Google handle mail from an IPv6 server?
I remember Google being where some of my first v6 email was
coming from and going to.
I would advise that if you allow your MTA to attach to all IPv6
addresses that you make sure all of them have REV PTR. Google, at
least last time I looked, would deny email via IPv6 based solely on REV
PTR errors. They are more forgiving over v4, but I suspect that
has/had to do with more mature spam filtering considerations on v4 than
v6.
I once made the mistake of not having one of my secondary
addresses set up with a REV PTR and Google rejected any email that came
from that IP.
--TimH
More information about the NANOG
mailing list