maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ?

Fri Sep 29 21:24:28 UTC 2023

s/DMS/DFZ/ — Not sure how autocrrect did that without me noticing, apologies.

> On Sep 29, 2023, at 14:11, Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog at nanog.org> wrote:
> 
> /32s are perfectly valid in the DMS, but there is currently an IETF limit of ~500M of them (the other 3.5B are not yet released to the RIRs, only 2000::/3).
> 
> Owen
> 
> 
>> On Sep 29, 2023, at 12:54, Collider <large.hadron.collider at gmx.com> wrote:
>> 
>> This thread is utter amateur hour. I too would rather /32s be valid in the DFZ - but they're not, for good reason (worstcase scenario = circa 4 bln. routing table entries - no BGP hwaccel can swing that!).
>> 
>> 
>> Le 29 septembre 2023 19:51:29 UTC, Seth Mattinen via NANOG <nanog at nanog.org> a écrit :
>>> On 9/29/23 10:24, VOLKAN SALİH wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> you guys become rich this way.. by playing penny pincher.
>>>> 
>>>> I asked global firms like Huawei, not some local company called ADAMS!
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> You joined the wrong mailing list then. This is NANOG, which has companies of all sizes and private individuals operating networks. This is not a "global firms" mailing list.
>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20230929/4e6a15a4/attachment.html>