[EXTERNAL] Re: Charter DNS servers returning malware filtered IP addresses
Michael Thomas
mike at mtcc.com
Fri Oct 27 23:02:09 UTC 2023
On 10/27/23 2:20 PM, John Levine wrote:
> It appears that Bryan Fields <Bryan at bryanfields.net> said:
>> -=-=-=-=-=-
>> -=-=-=-=-=-
>> On 10/27/23 7:49 AM, John Levine wrote:
>>> But for obvious good reasons,
>>> the vast majority of their customers don't
>> I'd argue that as a service provider deliberately messing with DNS is an
>> obvious bad thing. They're there to deliver packets.
> For a network feeding a data center, sure. For a network like
> Charter's which is feeding unsophisticated nontechnical users, they
> need all the messing they can get.
>
> If you're one of the small minority of retail users that knows enough
> about the technology to pick your own resolver, go ahead. But it's
> a reasonable default to keep malware out of Grandma's iPad.
How does this line up with DoH? Aren't they using hardwired resolver
addresses? I would hope they are not doing anything heroic.
Mike
More information about the NANOG
mailing list