QFX5k question

Mehmet Akcin mehmet at akcin.net
Sat Mar 23 19:52:53 UTC 2019


thanks for quick reply. I forgot to mention, 2 x 10G providers with full
routing table on each.

thank you...

On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 12:45 PM Paul S. <contact at winterei.se> wrote:

> QFX5100 as a L3 router + L2 switch performed well for us in the past, I
> don't see why it'd fall over in <1g traffic now.
>
> You should be good to go.
>
> On 3/24/2019 04:41 午前, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
> > Hey there,
> >
> > I am trying to get my hands on some QFX5000s and I have a rather quick
> > question.
> >
> > In the past, I often used MX + EX where MX did routing and I connected
> > all uplinks/peering and EX, and EX did switching, i connected my
> > servers to ex.
> >
> > in QFX, I am trying to see if I need EX or not? more importantly
> > (besides from what juniper papers say) are there any known issues
> > people run into for a small scale deployment. (100mbps-1gbps range 1
> > rack, 20 servers)
> >
> > my plan is to have QFX to it all, but i am worried, if this is too
> > much for QFX, if you have relative experience on this , feel free to
> > let me know
> >
> > thanks in advance
> >
> > mehmet
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190323/8eab3af6/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list