large BCP38 compliance testing

Mon Oct 20 19:22:34 UTC 2014

On 05/10/14 18:44, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:54 AM,  <Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu> wrote:
>> The *real* problem isn't the testing.
>> It's the assumption that you can actually *do* anything useful with this data.
>> Name-n-shame probably won't get us far - and the way the US works, if there's a
> 
> At least "name and shame"  is something more useful than nothing done.

Has it worked for the deaggregation offenders named by the CIDR report?